A Christian manuscript may be clear, engaging and grammatically correct, yet still contain weak interpretation, unsupported claims or inaccurate use of Scripture. This is why theological editing should come before comprehensive editing.

Comprehensive editing improves structure, flow, clarity, repetition, style and readability. Theological editing examines whether the message is faithful to Scripture, historically responsible and doctrinally sound.

There is little value in polishing a paragraph that may later need to be rewritten because its theological foundation is weak.

How Theological Editing Is Done

Theological editing is carried out by reading the manuscript alongside Scripture and testing its interpretations, doctrinal claims, applications and historical explanations. The editor checks whether each conclusion is supported by the biblical text, whether the original context has been preserved and whether uncertain ideas have been presented with appropriate caution.

The process may also involve comparing several Bible translations, consulting reputable commentaries, Bible dictionaries, theological works and historical sources. Where a subject falls outside the editor’s expertise, the manuscript may require review by a qualified theologian, pastor, biblical scholar or historian.

The theological editor then identifies statements that need correction, qualification, sourcing, expansion or removal. The aim is not to rewrite the author’s faith or voice, but to ensure that the message is biblically faithful, doctrinally responsible and clear enough for readers to trust.

a. The Original Meaning of Scripture Must Come First

A biblical passage should first be explained within its historical, literary and covenant context. Only after its original meaning is clear should the author move to fulfilment in Christ, application to the Church or present-day Christian experience.

The proper order is interpretation first, then theological connection, then application.

When application comes before interpretation, the author may force a modern meaning into the text. Theological editing protects Scripture from being reduced to illustrations for contemporary ideas.

Start

Read the Passage

Observe the words, structure and immediate setting.

Round 1

Establish Meaning

Identify the historical, literary and covenant context.

Round 2

Trace the Theology

Consider what the passage reveals about God and His purposes.

Round 3

Connect to Christ

Examine fulfilment or development in the New Testament.

Round 4

Apply Carefully

Draw a present-day application from the established meaning.

Finish

Faithful Teaching

Meaning, theology and application remain connected.

1.
Round 1: Establish the Meaning

The Original Meaning of Scripture Must Come First

This stage determines what the passage communicated to its first audience before the author moves to Christological connection, Church application or present-day Christian experience.

Example 1 Historical Context
Weak interpretation

Israel’s wilderness journey teaches that every believer must pass through a personal wilderness before receiving God’s promises.

Editorial decision

This moves immediately to personal application. The passage first records Israel’s historical journey, covenant testing and repeated unbelief after the Exodus.

Example 2 Literary Context
Weak interpretation

Every statement made by Job’s friends reveals God’s direct teaching about suffering.

Editorial decision

The literary setting matters. Job contains speeches from several characters, and not every statement reflects the book’s final theological conclusion.

Example 3 Covenant Context
Weak interpretation

Every command given to Israel under the Mosaic covenant applies directly and unchanged to the Church.

Editorial decision

The author must first identify the command’s covenant setting and then examine how the New Testament understands its fulfilment and continuing relevance.

The Proper Order

Interpretation before connection and application

01

Interpretation

What did the passage communicate within its original context?

02

Theological Connection

How does the passage contribute to the wider biblical story?

03

Application

How should believers respond faithfully in the present?

Editorial Revision

Build the application from the original meaning

Avoid

“David’s victory over Goliath proves that every Christian will defeat every personal giant.”

Better

“The account first reveals God delivering Israel through His chosen king. It also encourages believers to trust God rather than human strength when facing opposition.”

Context Check

Questions to answer before applying the passage

01

Historical

What was happening, and who first received the message?

02

Literary

Is the passage narrative, poetry, prophecy, wisdom or instruction?

03

Covenant

Under which covenant was the command or promise given?

04

Canonical

How does the wider Bible develop or fulfil the passage?

?
The Editor’s Test

Before approving an application, ask:

Has the author explained what the passage meant before explaining what it means today? Does the application grow naturally from the text, or has a modern idea been imposed upon it?

b. Christological Connections Must Be Biblically Grounded

Christian authors often seek to show how Scripture points to Christ. This is important, but not every similarity should be treated as an established messianic type.

Theological editing helps distinguish between direct prophecy, recognised biblical typology and devotional application. Where Scripture makes the connection clearly, the author may state it confidently. Where the connection is interpretive or devotional, the wording should reflect that level of certainty.

The goal is not to remove creativity, but to separate what Scripture teaches from what the author observes.

Start

Proposed Connection

The author identifies a possible link to Christ.

Round 1

Read the Passage

Examine the original context and intended meaning.

Round 2

Test the Connection

Check whether Scripture establishes the link.

Round 3

Classify the Claim

Prophecy, typology or devotional application.

Round 4

Revise the Wording

Match the language to the level of certainty.

Finish

Grounded Statement

Clear, responsible and biblically supported.

2.
Round 2: Test the Connection

Christological Connections Must Be Biblically Grounded

This stage examines whether a proposed connection to Jesus Christ is established by Scripture, recognised through biblical typology or best presented as a devotional observation.

Example 1 Direct Biblical Support
Sample statement

The Passover lamb points to Jesus Christ, whose sacrifice delivers believers from judgment.

Editorial decision

This connection may be stated confidently because the New Testament explicitly identifies Christ as the Passover Lamb.

Exodus 12; John 1:29; 1 Corinthians 5:7
Example 2 Recognised Typology
Sample statement

Jonah’s three days in the fish foreshadow Christ’s death, burial and resurrection.

Editorial decision

This is a grounded typological connection because Jesus used Jonah’s experience as a sign pointing towards His death and resurrection.

Jonah 1:17; Matthew 12:39–40
Example 3 Devotional Application
Overstated version

David’s five stones represent the five ministry gifts given to the Church.

Editorial decision

Scripture does not establish this symbolism. The number of stones should not be given a fixed theological meaning.

Editorial Revision

Match the wording to the evidence

Avoid

“David’s five stones clearly represent the five ministry gifts.”

Better

“David’s preparation reminds believers that God can use ordinary resources when they are surrendered to Him.”

?
The Editor’s Test

Before calling something a shadow of Christ, ask:

Does the New Testament make this connection? Is it supported by the wider witness of Scripture? Is it recognised biblical typology, or is it mainly a devotional comparison?

c. Symbolism and Traditions Must Be Verified

Christian writing sometimes gives fixed spiritual meanings to colours, numbers, materials, objects or architectural details. Some of these interpretations may be helpful, but not all are directly supported by Scripture.

Historical and religious traditions must also be checked. Familiarity does not make a claim accurate.

Where reliable biblical or historical support is unavailable, the claim should be removed or presented carefully as a possible interpretation rather than an established fact.

Start

Proposed Symbolism

The author assigns meaning to a colour, object, number or tradition.

Round 1

Check the Text

Does Scripture itself assign the proposed meaning?

Round 2

Verify the Source

Check biblical, historical and scholarly support.

Round 3

Classify the Claim

Biblical fact, historical tradition or devotional interpretation.

Round 4

Revise the Wording

Match the statement to the strength of the evidence.

Finish

Responsible Claim

Accurate, sourced and clearly qualified.

2.
Round 2: Verify the Source

Symbolism and Traditions Must Be Verified

This stage checks whether a proposed symbolic meaning or historical tradition is established by Scripture, supported by credible evidence or simply repeated because it is familiar.

Example 1 Explicit Biblical Symbolism
Sample statement

The lampstand represents the churches in John’s vision.

Editorial decision

This may be stated confidently because the biblical text itself explains the meaning of the symbol.

See Revelation 1:20
Example 2 Possible Devotional Symbolism
Overstated version

The number four always represents the whole earth.

Editorial decision

Scripture sometimes uses four in connection with the earth, such as the four winds or four corners, but it does not establish one fixed meaning for every occurrence of the number.

Example 3 Historical Tradition
Sample claim

Early believers always worshipped in a particular posture because it symbolised resurrection.

Editorial decision

This claim requires a reliable historical source. If the evidence is limited or disputed, the wording must acknowledge that uncertainty.

Editorial Revision

Do not turn a possibility into a certainty

Avoid

“The colour blue always symbolises heaven in Scripture.”

Better

“In some Christian interpretations, blue is associated with heaven, although Scripture does not assign this meaning in every context.”

Source Check

What kind of evidence supports the claim?

01

Biblical Text

Does the passage itself explain the meaning of the symbol?

02

Wider Scripture

Is the same meaning used consistently elsewhere in the Bible?

03

Credible History

Can the tradition be traced to a reliable historical source?

04

Qualified Language

Does the wording reflect uncertainty where evidence is limited?

?
The Editor’s Test

Before accepting a symbolic or traditional claim, ask:

Is the meaning stated in Scripture? Is it consistently supported by the wider biblical witness? Can the historical tradition be traced to a credible source? Is the author repeating a familiar claim without verifying where it came from?

d. Theological Statements Must Be Qualified

Authors sometimes state an interpretation as though it were the only possible meaning of a passage. Words such as “always”, “never”, “every”, “clearly” and “certainly” can make a reasonable idea sound more definite than Scripture allows.

Theological editing helps the author distinguish between explicit biblical teaching, theological conclusion and personal reflection.

Qualification does not weaken truth. It ensures that the author is confident where Scripture is clear and humble where faithful readers may differ.

Start

Draft Statement

The author presents an interpretation or doctrinal conclusion.

Round 1

Read the Context

Examine the passage, audience and wider biblical setting.

Round 2

Test the Certainty

Determine how strongly Scripture supports the statement.

Round 3

Classify the Claim

Biblical teaching, theological conclusion or personal reflection.

Round 4

Adjust the Wording

Remove unnecessary absolutes and add careful qualification.

Finish

Responsible Statement

Clear, faithful and honest about the level of certainty.

2.
Round 2: Test the Certainty

Theological Statements Must Be Qualified

This stage examines whether the author has presented an interpretation with more certainty than the biblical text allows. The wording should reflect whether the claim is explicit, strongly supported, possible or personally inferred.

Example 1 Explicit Biblical Teaching
Sample statement

God is faithful and does not abandon His covenant promises.

Editorial decision

This may be stated confidently because the claim is repeatedly and clearly established throughout Scripture.

See Deuteronomy 7:9; 2 Timothy 2:13; Hebrews 10:23
Example 2 Theological Conclusion
Overstated version

Every season of waiting is always God’s direct preparation for a greater public assignment.

Editorial decision

Scripture shows that God may use waiting to shape His people, but it does not promise that every waiting season leads to a public role or visible promotion.

Example 3 Personal Reflection
Overstated version

This passage clearly teaches that every closed opportunity is God’s protection.

Editorial decision

The statement moves from personal experience to universal doctrine. A closed opportunity may be God’s protection, but Scripture does not require that conclusion in every situation.

Editorial Revision

Match the strength of the words to the strength of the evidence

Avoid

“Every closed door is certainly God protecting you from harm.”

Better

“At times, God may use a closed opportunity to protect, redirect or prepare His people, although this should be discerned carefully.”

Language Check

Watch for words that may overstate the claim

Always

Does the statement apply without exception in every biblical context?

Never

Has Scripture ruled out every possible exception or circumstance?

Every

Is the author turning a common pattern into a universal promise?

Clearly

Is the meaning explicit, or is it one recognised interpretation?

Certainly

Does the biblical evidence justify complete confidence in the claim?

Claim Levels

Choose wording that reflects what the manuscript can prove

01

Explicit

“Scripture teaches…” when the point is directly stated in the text.

02

Strongly Supported

“This passage shows…” when the conclusion is well supported by context.

03

Possible Interpretation

“This may suggest…” when the text allows but does not demand the view.

04

Personal Reflection

“This reminds me…” when the statement arises from devotional response.

?
The Editor’s Test

Before accepting a strong theological statement, ask:

Is this directly stated in Scripture, strongly inferred from the passage, one recognised theological position or the author’s personal reflection? Does the wording communicate the correct level of certainty?

e. Difficult Biblical Subjects Need Balanced Treatment

Subjects such as judgment, warfare, suffering, purity laws, slavery, women in Scripture, Israel and the Church, and the use of Old Testament law require careful explanation.

A brief or one-sided treatment may create confusion or leave important questions unanswered.

Balanced treatment does not weaken biblical truth. It means considering the wider biblical context, addressing difficult questions honestly and presenting the whole counsel of Scripture.

Start

Identify the Subject

Recognise where the passage raises difficult theological or ethical questions.

Round 1

Read the Context

Examine the passage within its historical, literary and covenant setting.

Round 2

Address the Tension

Identify the moral, emotional and theological questions readers may carry.

Round 3

Compare Scripture

Consider the wider biblical witness rather than one isolated passage.

Round 4

Explain Carefully

Present truth clearly without hiding complexity or overstating conclusions.

Finish

Balanced Teaching

The reader receives clarity, context and a responsible theological explanation.

2.
Round 2: Address the Tension

Difficult Biblical Subjects Need Balanced Treatment

This stage checks whether the manuscript has addressed difficult theological and ethical questions honestly, carefully and within the wider witness of Scripture.

Example 1 Suffering
One-sided statement

Suffering always proves that a believer has disobeyed God.

Editorial decision

Scripture sometimes connects suffering with consequences for sin, but it also presents righteous suffering, persecution, testing and suffering that remains unexplained.

Consider Job, John 9:1–3, 2 Corinthians 12:7–10 and 1 Peter 4:12–16.
Example 2 Old Testament Law
One-sided statement

Christians must obey every Old Testament law exactly as Israel did.

Editorial decision

The manuscript must distinguish Israel’s covenant obligations from the way Christ and the New Testament fulfil and apply the law to the Church.

Example 3 Women in Scripture
Weak treatment

A difficult passage is quoted without considering its historical setting, literary purpose or related passages.

Editorial decision

The author should consider the immediate context, the wider biblical witness, recognised interpretations and the pastoral effect of the explanation.

Balanced Treatment

Four elements every difficult subject needs

01

Context

Explain the historical, literary and covenant setting of the passage.

02

Whole Counsel

Compare the passage with other relevant Scriptures before concluding.

03

Honest Tension

Acknowledge difficult questions rather than pretending they do not exist.

04

Careful Language

Avoid simplistic answers, unnecessary absolutes and careless conclusions.

Editorial Revision

Move from a one-sided claim to a fuller biblical explanation

Avoid

“If you are suffering, you must have done something wrong.”

Better

“Scripture presents several causes of suffering. Some suffering follows sinful choices, while other suffering arises from persecution, testing, life in a fallen world or circumstances whose full purpose remains hidden.”

Balance Check

Questions to ask before approving the section

01

What is missing?

Has the author ignored an important passage, perspective or question?

02

Is it too brief?

Does the complexity of the subject require more explanation?

03

Is it one-sided?

Has one biblical truth been emphasised while another has been ignored?

04

Is it pastorally responsible?

Could the wording wound, shame or mislead readers unnecessarily?

?
The Editor’s Test

Before approving a difficult theological section, ask:

Has the author considered the wider biblical context, addressed the reader’s likely questions and avoided a simplistic conclusion? Does the section present biblical truth fully, honestly and responsibly?

f. Scripture, Theology and Historical Claims Must Be Verified

Every Scripture quotation should be checked word for word against the stated Bible version. References, punctuation and context should also be verified.

Historical and cultural claims must be supported by reliable sources. Ancient customs, political events, religious groups and social practices should not be repeated simply because they appear in sermons, blogs or popular books.

Theological editing confirms that claims are accurate, properly sourced and used in a way that genuinely supports the author’s argument.

Start

Identify the Claim

Locate every quotation, reference, historical detail and theological statement.

Round 1

Check the Source

Confirm where the claim, quotation or explanation comes from.

Round 2

Verify Accuracy

Compare the wording, reference, date, context and interpretation.

Round 3

Evaluate Reliability

Determine whether the source is authoritative and appropriate.

Round 4

Revise or Cite

Correct the claim, qualify it or add a credible reference.

Finish

Verified Content

The manuscript presents accurate and properly supported information.

2.
Round 2: Verify Accuracy

Scripture, Theology and Historical Claims Must Be Verified

This stage checks whether quotations are exact, references are correct, historical information is reliable and theological claims genuinely support the author’s argument.

Example 1 Scripture Quotation
Unverified version

“For I know the plans I have for you, plans to make you prosperous and successful in everything.”

Editorial decision

The wording must be checked against the Bible version named by the author. Paraphrased language should not be placed inside quotation marks as though it were an exact biblical quotation.

Check Jeremiah 29:11 in the stated translation.
Example 2 Historical Claim
Unsupported statement

Every synagogue in the first century followed exactly the same worship order and leadership structure.

Editorial decision

This is too broad and requires historical evidence. Practices could vary by location and period, so the author should avoid universal language unless strong sources support it.

Example 3 Theological Claim
Weak argument

A single verse is quoted to prove a doctrine without considering the surrounding passage or other relevant Scriptures.

Editorial decision

The verse may be accurate but still misused. The editor must check its context and whether the wider biblical witness supports the conclusion being drawn.

Verification Framework

Four checks before a claim is approved

01

Exact Wording

Confirm that quotations match the stated Bible version or source.

02

Correct Context

Check whether the passage or source supports the author’s conclusion.

03

Reliable Source

Use reputable commentaries, histories, dictionaries and academic works.

04

Accurate Citation

Record the source clearly enough for readers and editors to verify it.

Editorial Revision

Move from a repeated claim to a verifiable statement

Avoid

“Ancient people always believed that names determined a person’s destiny.”

Better

“In many ancient cultures, names could communicate identity, family expectation or significant circumstances, although practices differed across communities and periods.”

Source Hierarchy

Not every source carries the same weight

01

Primary Sources

Scripture, ancient documents, original records and first-hand material.

02

Academic Sources

Peer-reviewed studies, scholarly histories and recognised commentaries.

03

Reference Works

Trusted Bible dictionaries, encyclopaedias and theological handbooks.

04

Popular Sources

Sermons, blogs and social posts may inspire but still require verification.

Final Verification Check

Confirm every important detail before publication

01

Quotation

Is it exact, complete and correctly attributed?

02

Reference

Is the chapter, verse, date, name or location correct?

03

Context

Has the source been used in a way that reflects its real meaning?

04

Evidence

Can another editor or reader trace and confirm the claim?

?
The Editor’s Test

Before approving any quotation or factual claim, ask:

Is the wording exact? Is the reference correct? Is the source reliable? Has the claim been used within its proper context? Can the evidence be traced and independently verified?

Why This Editing Must Happen First

Theological review may require a section to be removed, expanded, rewritten, qualified or sourced. If comprehensive editing is completed first, much of that work may be lost.

The recommended order is:

Theological editing
Developmental editing
Comprehensive or line editing
Copy-editing
Proofreading
Final Scripture verification

Theological editing protects the message. Comprehensive editing improves how the message is presented.

The Responsibility of Christian Authors and Publishers

Christian books teach. They shape doctrine, influence discipleship and may remain in circulation for many years.

Theological editing is not intended to silence the author. It helps the author communicate with greater accuracy, humility and responsibility.

A manuscript may begin with conviction, testimony or a strong spiritual burden. It must still be examined carefully. The aim is to ensure that when the language is polished, the message itself is faithful to Scripture and worthy of the reader’s trust.

Training by: Dr. Muthoni Mercy Omukhango

Dr. Muthoni Mercy Omukhango is a Christian publisher, author, trainer, and marketplace minister. She serves as National Director of CLC Kenya, Authors’ Manager at the African Christian Authors Book Award (ACABA), Convener of Mama Africa Book Box, and Patron of CLC Kids and Teens.

Through the Publishing in Africa Series, she equips authors, publishers, and literary entrepreneurs with practical strategies for developing, publishing, distributing, and growing African-authored literature.

Her ministry is centred on advancing God’s Kingdom through literature and helping more African voices to be written, published, distributed, and read.

Getting Started: Publishing Books

Preparing to Write/Publish

Elementary Skills: Publishing Books

How to Write

Technical Skills: Publishing Books

Refining Your Manuscript

Advanced Skills: Publishing Books

Going the Extra Mile

Contractual Skills: Publishing Books

Be Informed (Not Legal Advice)